B.C. Supreme Court Humiliation and Judgement Construction
Justice Blair said:
[20] Dr. White deposed that he discussed the risks of the vasectomy with Mr. Postnikoff on both September 30 and November 5, 1994, before referring him to Dr. Morrow... "Blair, J." BLAIR J.
The Truth: Judge Blair does not dispute fraud:
Any alleged discussion of risk was totally fabricated by Justice Blair. Further unsupported allegations include Dr. Philip Anthony White getting paid for the same attendance Justice Blair alleged never happened. This is Judicial Fraud. Justice Blair is the sole person making these very serious allegations, allegations not presented as evidence. Judge Blair's allegations used to eliminate the truthful submissions of Mr. Postnikoff. No one disputing this attendance. Fraud is claimed on an attendance claimed by Judge Blair not to have happened, the Doctor paid for this same attendance. Judge Blair knows he cannot support his allegations.
Serious Unsupported Judicial Allegations.
Expert Evidence Question #4
Question 4: |
4) Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White depose that he had discussed possible risks of a vasectomy with Mr. Paul Peter Postnikoff on September 30, 1994? |
Expert Answer 4: |
4) Dr. White states at clause number 6 that, "On that occasion, I explained the procedure to him as I always do in such cases." He does not fully explain what he did say (if anything) in terms of discussing possible risks. Further information is needed to determine what Dr. White suggests was discussed on September 30, 1994. Referral to Exhibit "B" does not provide any help in determining what was discussed; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor. |
Question 5: |
5) If... Dr. Philip Anthony White's affidavit deposed that risks had been discussed on September 30, 1994, What were the risks claimed to be discussed on that day that appear within his affidavit? |
Expert Answer 5: |
5) There is no reference in the affidavit to specific risks claimed to have been discussed on that day; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor. |
Fraud is Claimed on Alleged Consent.
FRAUD!
Fraud on Alleged Consent: All allegations made by Judge Blair and B.C. Court of Appeal Madam Justice Ryan of an informed consent are disputed as fraudulent. There was no consent. No evidence of consent had been presented by any Doctor. Judges Alleged evidence failed to appear. Judicial Fraud is Claimed.
Judge Blair and Judge Ryan fraudulent and failed attempt attacking the Plaintiff and his Family using Judicial violent humiliation and judgement construction has failed.
FRAUD!
Deceptive Claims of an Open Court
Justice Blair rejected the Plaintiff request to permit the the upcoming trial and the cross-examination of Dr. Philip Anthony White or Dr. Donald Ray Morrow and chose violent humiliation.
Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged evidence that failed to appear.
Dr. Philip Anthony White and Dr. Donald Ray Morrow failed to present the court with any evidence of an alleged disclosure to support Judge Blair's alleged informed consent and judgement construction. |