chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council, chief, justice, judge, beverley, mclachlin, canada, canadian, courts, court, supreme, british columbia, judicial, standard, standards, conduct, misconduct, involvement, fraud, obstruction, judicial, council

Image
Kelowna Court House
Minister of Justice Anne McLellan
Senior Government Member Paul Martin
Prime Minister Jean Chretien
Anne McLellan
Government Canada
Paul Martin
Government Canada
Jean Chretien
Government Canada
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
Shame on British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair. Fraud is claimed on issues of consent and alleged evidence that failed to appear.

The laws of Canada require this precedent to be applied to your family.

A request to present proof of fraud, involvement and misconduct was formally made to the Prime Minister, Justice Department and Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin. They have denied the ability to openly present this proof of fraud after being informed of the facts. Judge Blair does not have to produce his alleged evidence nor explain. In this case the Prime Minister's and Chief Justice of Canada's claims of an independent court intended to suppress open scrutiny of Judge Blair and deprive this family's ability to question and present proof of misconduct and fraud. Removal of B.C. Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair is not an issue for the courts. Judge Blair fails to dispute the proof of fraud.

Take Note:   Justice Blair made serious unsupported allegations that alleged experts employed by the doctors claimed an informed consent.  Absolutely no inference can be taken from alleged doctor experts who provided him with some form of evidence that an informed consent was provided or any discussions had taken place, when these alleged discussions had not.  Experts hired by the doctors, who failed to see any evidence from the Plaintiff, when fraud is claimed have absolutely no credibility.  Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. Fraud is claimed on judges allegations that failed to appear anywhere in the evidence.

Image

Senior Government officials have been contacted with a request for help, in having the ability to openly present proof of fraud and judgement construction. They did not help. The Government of Canada has deemed the independence of the Canadian Courts and the issues relating to judges fraud and misconduct as the same. There is absolutely no place for this family to present the proof of fraud and corruption. The removal of Judge Blair is not an issue for the courts.

Image

The Government of Canada created the Canadian Judicial Council in 1971, the Prime Minister federally appoints supreme court judges to his choosing. These are political appointments, they are life long and not elected. The Government appoints inquiry members to the Canadian Judicial Council. The Prime Minister and Justice Minister claim they are unable to assist in calling any independent inquiry into Justice Blair. This is the key part of Government involvement within the Courts and the cover up within this case. These are high level, hidden tactics of cover up having the Government of Canada immediately claim independence although evidence of misconduct and fraud has been presented. It is difficult to imagine that Canadian Courts are deemed independent to include "without scrutiny", "fraudulent" and "unable to ask a judge questions when there is fraud". Lucky for the Canadian Government, Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of Canada most Canadians are greatly focused on what is on television rather than what is happening around them or in the courts. The evidence does not agree with the Canadian Judicial Council claims of trust. There is fraud. If the Canadian Government was truly independent it would ensure independent questions are asked. Independent questions are not asked. Obstruction of Justice goes to the highest levels of Government and Canadian Courts. Canadian Judicial Council bias is to support judges. The Canadian Government support is for the Canadian Judicial Council with its claim of independence. Evidence of misconduct is secondary for all these people, with the first priority to support each other. There is absolutely no independence of Canadian Courts having full participation of the Justice Minister, Prime Minister and Chief Justice of Canada in suppressing corruption within the courts. The Canadian Judicial Council is the method for this corruption to happen within the Canadian Courts without the public being informed. The Government of Canada failure to act or ask questions in this case is significant and a precedent in Canadian Law, it has protected Supreme Court Judges ability to allege evidence that does not appear and have dinner with witnesses. An Appeal was not permitted. Every Canadian has been affected.

 

 

 

Image

This Internet website shall be removed upon being provided the ability to present evidence of fraud, until then it shall remain as a Government of Canada Canadian Judicial Council precedent as it relates to the standard of conduct set for Supreme Court Judges in Canada. This site would not exist today if an examination of evidence had been permitted. One of the main reasons, there are several reasons for this site, is this family's character has been fraudulently assaulted and humiliated publically by Justice Blair within Government Internet sites, yet Justice Blair would be unable to defend his judgement or present alleged evidence. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. Fraud is claimed on alleged evidence that failed to appear. Justice Blair's judgement is acceptable to the Government of Canada, it forms a Government accepted standard for future judgements and complaints. Judge Blair fails to dispute the proof of fraud. B.C. Court of Appeal makes Government accepted fraudulent claims. All future equality rights are claimed.

Image

The Government of Canada has protected Supreme Court Judges ability to commit fraud, have dinner with witnesses and allege evidence that does not appear anywhere. An Appeal was not permitted. Until overturned this is the Canadian standard set. All Canadian equality rights are claimed by this family.

Maybe Justice Blair should seek professional psychiatric assistance for the problems he has in making allegations that do not appear in the evidence.

Although not recognized as a Canadian Court, significant is the Government of Canada recognizing the Canadian Judicial Council as a part of the Governments claim of judicial independence. All future legal and equality rights are reserved by this family. Judge Blair's underhanded judgement has set a terrible Canadian Judicial Council precedent with respect to not permitting the examination of evidence including a Judge having dinner with witnesses, correspondence used as expert medical reports, witnesses and cross-examination not being permitted, alleged Judges evidence did not appear anywhere, both evidence and law withheld in order to provide for benefit and a judge's constructive application of evidence. Dr. Philip Anthony White gets it both ways, paid for the same attendance Judge Blair alleged to never happened. Interesting this attendence was not disputed. Fraud is claimed. Justice Blair would be unable to defend his judgement and is not required to produce manufactured evidence nor explain. Until overturned the Canadian Judicial Council is a place of fraud, cover-up and corruption. All future equality and legal rights are claimed by this family. This is the standard of conduct set for Canadian Judges.

Image
Image
Image

"No, the affidavit does not even refer to an affidavit presented by Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff;" ...
John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.p

Image

"No, there is no referance in Dr. White's affidavit claiming an inability to recall the attendance of
Dianna Lynn Postnikoff at his office on September 20, 1994;" ... John David McGreevy, Barrister &
Solicitor.

Image

"Dr. White states at clause number 6 that, "On that occasion, I explained the procedure to him as I
always do in such cases." He does not fully explain what he did say (if anything) in terms of
discussing possible risks. Further information is needed to determine what Dr. White suggests was
discussed on September 30, 1994. Referral to Exhibit "B" does not provide any help in determining
what was discussed;" ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.

Image

"There is no reference in the affidavit to specific risks claimed to have been discussed on that day;
" ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.C

Image

"There are no disclosure forms or other signed documents by Paul Postnikoff confirming that risks
had been disclosed or discussed." ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.

Image
Government of Canada Paul Martin
Government of Canada Sheila Copps
Government of Canada Lawrence MacAulay
Government of Canada John Manley
Government of Canada Herb Grey
Government of Canada Don Boudria
Government of Canada Allen Rock
Government of Canada Brian Tobin
Herb Grey
Government Canada
John Manley
Government Canada
Don Boudria
Government Canada
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
Paul Martin
Government Canada
Image
Brian Tobin
Government Canada
Allen Rock
Government Canada
Sheila Copps
Government Canada
Lawrence MacAulay
Government Canada
Senior Government officials never asked any questions.

We are all very pleased to give your family this precedent.

Stephen Harper, Jean Chretien, Anne McLellan, Paul Martin, Allan Rock, John Manley, Sheila Copps, Don Boudria, Brian Tobin and many other senior government officials have been contacted with proof of judicial fraud and Judges involvement. With a claimed independent court senior Government of Canada members will not involve themselves in issues of Judicial fraud and involvement. Expert proof of fraud and documents have been presented to the Government of Canada and Canadian Judicial Council. They have denied the ability to openly present this proof. The Canadian Judicial Council is a clearing house method of concealing corruption and fraud within Canadian Courts.

The Canadian Government methods are such that real evidence is not important. Importance is given to what has been claimed by Canadian Judicial Council and evidence is not required to support the Council's allegations made. The Government of Canada uses these unsupported claims made by the Canadian Judicial Council and its claim of independence to obstruct justice. The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption.

Government Cabinet Ministers who failed to assist in this case can be deemed without credibility on issues that affect Canadians.

Image
Image

A Canadian Precedent in Law.

Image
   Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.
Image
   There is proof that Kamloops B.C. Justice Richard Blair is a fraud.
Image

Click Here

Canadian Judicial Council
Copyright 2002 - 2006 all rights reserved.

The information contained herein is a representation of what would have been heard if the Government of Canada had permitted the facts regarding the fraud of Justice Blair. An examination of evidence was requested and denied.Judge Blair's judgement has been approved by the Prime Minister and Chief Justice of Canada and sets this case as the Government accepted standard of conduct for Canadian Judges. All rights are claimed. An Appeal was not permitted.

Also by way of a silent acceptance and coverup all senior members of Government which had been contacted including Paul Martin, Don Boudria, Shiela Copps, John Manley, Herb Grey, Allen Rock and others have accepted fraud and involvement within this judgement. They had been provided with the evidence of misconduct and fraud. This perspective of proper justice must be kept when reading this site unless you believe differently. This is an accepted standard. A precedent in Canadian Law.

The Plaintiff believes that Justice Blair is unable to defend his judgement, that his judgement is bias due to friendships and dinner parties at the homes of witnesses and lacks total credibility. Justice Blair publically humiliated the plaintiff and his family with allegations he knows to be untrue. Neither Justice Blair nor Dr. Philip Anthony White have been charged, not asked to explain anything, not required to produce any evidence nor convicted of any offense.

All claims that have been made by the Canadian Government, Canadian Judicial Council, Prime Minister and Chief Justice are completely without substance. All Canadian equality rights have been claimed by this family.


Judge Blair is a complete and utter fraudulent idiot... I have proof to completely back this statement.. He is the most cowardly man living in Canada today.

Image
Image

"When a person effects the character, dignity or the trustworthiness of another person, whether it was intentional or not, whether by mistake or not, it is incumbent upon that person to fully explain what was done should the effected person request a full explanation. Failure to adopt this feature would result in unsupported allegations to be made."

"Without reasonable explanation and producing his alleged evidence, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Blair is believed to be a Canadian Judicial Fraud who continues to hear cases today."

A request to present proof of fraud, involvement and misconduct was formally made to the Prime Minister, Justice Department and Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin. They have denied the ability to openly present this proof after being informed of the facts. Judge Blair does not have to produce his alleged evidence nor explain. In this case the Prime Minister's and Chief Justice of Canada's claims of an independent court intended to suppress open scrutiny of Judge Blair and deprive this family's ability to question and present proof of misconduct and fraud.

Canadian Judicial Council

The Canadian Judicial Council.

The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
Canada Chief Justice Beverly Mclachlin
Chief Justice of Canada
Beverley McLachlin
Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin
The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption within Canadian Courts. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent and alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear.
Image
Image

A Canadian Precedent in Law

All Canadian equality rights are claimed in this case. I have discovered that Canadian Judges are permitted by law to make allegations that fail to appear anywhere within the evidence in order to favor one side or friendships. This is Canadian law where judges within Canadian Supreme Courts and Appeal Courts are able to avoid justice and explanation when there is proof of fraud. Ordinary Canadian people have the courts and Canadian Government work together to provide these hidden corrupt practices to society. They avoid examination of themselves wherever possible. This lack of scrutiny fails to permit the Canadian people to define the Canadian Government, Canadian Judges and Courts. While the crooked Canadian politicians and Canadian Courts grow very much stronger and stronger, disturbing is they are able to do anything they please, it is easy for them to pick off Canadians one at a time. The Courts and their friends are gaining greater corrupt criminal strength each day. They become able to make fraudulent claims, hand down corrupt judgements and do unlawful acts without explanation. All senior people who are in control of society each have reasons not to permit evidence of Judicial Fraud to surface in Canada... Because this would make the Courts accountable to ordinary people. This case is no mistake for these people... Although mistake may be claimed once they are challenged. As in the past an "easily accepted" Government claim of "learning from this" may once again be used in order to gain criminal control over Canadians. Everything Government and the Courts do is for a reason and until overturned by the Canadian people this is a precedent regarding the accepted standard set for Canadian Judges....  remember this next time you go to court. Without judgement accountability, Canadian Justice Minister's Anne McLellan's allegations that judgements being a part of public record as a "safeguard to Canadian democracy" is a borderline on delusional thinking. Fraud is claimed.

Justice Blair pointed and yelled "My friendships will have no effect on judgement." He refused stepping aside from his involvement and dinner at witnesses homes.

Fraud. Dr. Philip Anthony White gets it both ways, paid for the same attendance Judge Blair alleged never happened. Judge Blair making serious unsupported allegations.